The social capabilities of biomimetic industrial products and their relationship to aesthetic preference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts1459Keywords:
Aesthetic Preferences, Social Abilities, Industrial ProductsAbstract
The research tagged with (the social capabilities of the simulated industrial products of the organism and its relationship to aesthetic preference) was concerned with studying the phenomenon of the social capabilities of the simulated products of the organism that affects the role of social capabilities in adding the aesthetic preference dye of the identity of the industrial product for the purpose of meeting and filling the consumer's need, so the research problem is represented by the following question: Are social capabilities related to the aesthetic preference of the mimic industrial product of the organism (robot)? Research is a step to study and define the concept of social capabilities and their relationship to designing the simulated products of the organism. As for the research methodology, it resulted in the selection of the research sample according to its proximity to the study objectives. Products from CEREVO and Keenon contained the year from (2020 to 2023). (5) samples were chosen by a intentional sample of two appropriate models for the research requirements. It contained a description of the models and their analysis and containing the results and conclusions that the researcher leads to, the most important of which are: the aesthetic preferences in the design of the industrial product and their relationship to social capabilities play an essential role in emotional treatment and motivated by aesthetics to form the foundations of an interaction between man and the industrial product through (direction, emotion, complexity).
References
Al-Sadhan, Musaed bin Abdullah and Nahar Bahij Abdel Fattah: “Comprehensive design and the extent of applying its principles within residential buildings in the city of Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.” Emirates Journal of Engineering Research, pp. 3-4
Billings DR, Schaefer KE, Chen JY, Hancock PA. 2012. Human robot interaction: developing trust in robots. In: HRI12- proceedings of the 7th annual ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. Piscataway: IEEE, 109 110.
Blijlevens, J., Creusen, M. E. H., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2009). How consumers perceive product appearance: The identification of three product appearance attributes. International Journal of Design, 3(3), 27-35.
Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16-29.
C. Breazeal (2002). ‘Designing Sociable Robots’. Cambridge, MA, USA. MIT Press.
Coeckelbergh. 2012. Can we trust robots? Ethics and Information Technology 14(1):53 60
D. Hanson (2006). ‘Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots. Proceedings of the ICCS/Cog Sci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mecha nisms of Android Science.
Floyd M, Drinkwater MW, Aha DW (2014) Floyd M, Drinkwater MW. Situation-based behavioral adaptation using an inverse measure of confidence. AAAI Workshop - Technical Report 2014
Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appear ance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: The 12th IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, proceedings. ROMAN 2003, Mill brae, CA, USA, p.55–60
Green, SA, Billinghurst M, ChenX, Chase JG. 2008. Human-robot col-laboration: a literature review and augmented reality approach in design. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems 5:1-18
Hajy, W. F. (2018, January). Effect of Active Learning Strategy on Mathematical Concepts Acquisition in Mathematics for Fourth Grade Primary. Journal of College of Education for Women, pp. 1939-1948.
Hamdi, Najwa Muhammad: The Concept of Complexity and Simplification in Interior Design, Journal of International Design, Scientific Society of Designers, Volume 11, Volume 1, 2021, pp. 3-5.
Hekkert, P., & Leder, H. (2008). Product aesthetics. In H. N. J. Schiffer stein & P. Hekkert (Eds.), Product experience (pp. 259-285). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
Hsiao, K. A., & Chen, L. L. (2006). Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(6), 553-564.
Huang W. 2016. When HCI meets HRI: Intersection and Excellence. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Northern Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1-8.
Hung, W. K., & Chen, L. L. (2012). Effects of novelty and its dimensions on aesthetic preference in product design. International Journal of Design, 6(2), 81-90
K. Klemp and K. Ueki-Polet (2010). ‘Less and More: The Design Ethos of Dieter Rams’. Die Gestalten Verlag, Berlin.
L. A. Zebrowitz (1997). ‘Reading Faces: Window to the Soul?’ Boulder, CO, Westview Press.
Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(5), 603-618.
N. Tractinsky, A.S. Katz, D. Ikar (2000). ‘What is beautiful is usable’. Interacting with Computers 13, pp. 127-145.
Petersen M, Iversen O, Krogh P, Ludvigsen M. 2004. Aesthetic interaction a pragma tists aesthetics of interactive systems. 269-276.
Pfeifer R, Lungarella M, Iida F (2012) The challenges ahead for bio-inspired “soft” robotics. Commun ACM 55(11):76–87.
S. E. Guthrie (1997). ‘Anthropomorphism: A Definition and a the ory’. In: R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Thompson, and H. L. Miles, ‘Anthro pomorphism, anecdotes, and animals. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Stoeva D, Gelautz M. 2000. Body language in affective human robot inter-action. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction. Piscataway: IEEE, 606 608.
T. W. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, I, K. Dautenhahn (2003). ‘A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots: Concepts, Design, and Applications’, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3 – 4), 142 – 166.
ThrunS (2004) Towards a framework for human-robot interaction. Human Interaction 19 (1-2): 9-24.
Veryzer, R. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1998). The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 374- 385
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tayseer Abdul Karim Abboud, Ali Ghazi Matar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
