Aesthetic features of the art of decoupage and their representations in the productions of art education students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts1179Keywords:
Aesthetic features, the art of decoupageAbstract
This research dealt with the study of the aesthetic features of the art of decoupage and their representations in the products of art education students.
In the importance of the research, the two researchers touched on the need that prompted them to adopt this topic. As for the goal of the research, it started from the title and the problem, as follows:
(Discovering the aesthetic features of the art of decoupage and their representations in the productions of art education students).
The two researchers defined the limits of the research, which were represented by the students of the Department of Art Education / College of Fine Arts / University of Baghdad 2022_2023 AD. The researchers also defined the terms in the light of the nature of the current research, including: (characterization, beauty, the art of decoupage) idiomatically and procedurally, then the researchers moved to the second chapter, which Two sections included the first dealing with the study of the concept of the aesthetic feature, touching on some philosophical ideas that pertain to the subject of beauty for artistic achievements, and also with regard to some aesthetic opinions between philosophers of beauty and art, as well as addressing the most important aesthetic features, while the second topic discussed the concept of decoupage art and the most important types of this art, He also touched on some of the number and tools used, and the researchers extracted their indications about the theoretical framework represented by this chapter and paved the way for the third chapter, which included the research procedures. The fourth is based on the results of the research, recommendations, and proposals, and through the findings of the study, and after the analysis process, the two researchers reviewed their results, which are as follows:
1 - The aesthetic features (aesthetic emotion) were taken as a basis for them in the process of formal synthesis, the psychological or psychological context and the pure aesthetic context.
2 - The aesthetic feature of the artistic achievement in the art of decoupage came according to a different tactile context and a different raw context (various materials).
The researchers also reached several conclusions regarding the aesthetic features in the artistic achievements, and then reviewed the proposals.
References
Abbas, S. (2000). Ceramic Elements and Its Innovative Features. Misr: Dar Nahdet.
Abdul-Amir, A. (1996). Aesthetics of Form in Modern Iraqi Painting unpublished doctoral dissertation, College of Fine Arts. Baghdad: University of Baghdad.
AbdulHussein. (2001). attribute. cairo: Egypt.
AbuHatab, F. (1980). Mental Abilities (3rd ed.). Egypt: Anglo Egyptian Bookshop.
Al-Alfi, A. S. (1973). Brief History of Public Art. Cairo: he Egyptian General Book Authority.
albareiu. (2019). The concept and origins of the art of decoupage.
Al-Fahdawi. (2018). aesthetic features. baghdad: university of baghdad.
Al-Marayati, K. J. (2007). Ecological Psychology. House of Wisdom Journal(45).
Al-Moussawi, L. (2007). Sociology of Art, Ways of Seeing. (M. Al-Gohary, Trans.) Kuwait: The World of Knowledge.
Cooper, A. (2008). Culture, Anthropological Interpretation. (T. Fathi, Trans.) Kuwait: Knowledge World.
davis, D. (2000). Decoupage tools and supplies.
Eid, K. (1980). Aesthetics of Arts, The Small Encyclopedia. Dar Al-Hurriya for Printing.
Eisenberg, H. (2001). Interior Spaces. (A. A.-R. Al-Harith Abdel-Hamid, Trans.) Baghdad: House of Wisdom.
gnome. (2021). Types of decoupage art.
Ibrahim, L. H. (1969). Artistic Culture between Authenticity and Contemporaryness and its Role in Preparing the Art Teacher. Cairo: Fine Art Culture Conference.
Jihan. (2019). The concept and origins of the art of decoupage.
jocasta, i., & Walton. (1995). Decoupage tools and supplies.
Kobler, G. (1965). The Emergence of the Human Arts, A Study in the History of Things. (A. a.-M. al-Nashif, Trans.) Beirut: The National Institution for Printing and Publishing.
Lucie. (1975).
Mallens. (1993). The relationship between Gothic drawings and church drawings with modernity.
Nobler, N. (1987). Dialogue of Vision, An Introduction to Art Tasting and Aesthetic Experience. (J. I. Jabra, Ed., & F. Khalil, Trans.) Baghdad: Dar Al-Ma’moun.
pryce, M. (2015). The art of decoupage, a magical aesthetic way to hide imperfections.
Sorio, A. (1982). Aestheticism Through the Ages (2nd ed.). (M. Assi, Trans.) Beirut - Paris: Oweidat Publications.
wahba, m. (1974). Aesthetics. cairo: Egypt.
yunan. (1969). Characteristics of art in the twentieth century.
Jabbar Mohammed, H. (2022). Strategies of brain-based learning theory and its impact on the achievement of students of the Department of Art Education in Teaching Methods. Al-Academy, (106), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts106/97-114
Saleh Moraished, L., & Saleh Al-Saleh, M. (2022). The Relationship Between Using Diverse Materials to the Intellectual Context’s in the Art of Contemporary Ceramic. Al-Academy, (106), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts106/253-270
yassen jaleel , M., & Khazaal Baheel , J. (2022). Philosophy of values and its epistemological representations in industrial product design. Al-Academy, (106), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts106/319-336
Khazaal Baheel, J. ., & Abdul Jabbar Hameed Al- obaidi, shymaa . (2022). Interaction and functional structural transformation of product design. Al-Academy, (105), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts105/81-104
Saleh Mahdi Hussein, H., & Ahmed Al-Fahdawi, S. (2023). Classroom communication in art education lessons between concept and function. Al-Academy, (108), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.35560/jcofarts108/77-92
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Haneen ali salam , Malik hameed muhsin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
